|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Magic Numbers: The 33 Key Ratios That Every Investor Should Know |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| Publisher |
| John Wiley & Sons |
 |
| Published |
| December 2001 |
 |
| ISBN |
| 0471479241 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| $39.95 |
|
List Price |
 |
| $26.37 |
|
OUR PRICE |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| Sales Rank: |
|
162,175 |
|
|
 |
| AVAILABILITY: |
|
|
| Usually ships in 24 hours |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
In Magic Numbers, investment analyst Peter Temple provides a straightforward primer to calculating and interpreting 33 key investment ratios. The book is organized into five sections that explain market-based ratios (e.g., market capitalization, P/E ratios), income statement ratios (margins, earnings per share), balance sheet rations (price/cash ratio, burn rate), cash flow ratios, and risk and volatility ratios. Each chapter clearly shows the inputs necessary to calculate a particular ratio and explains its relevance in evaluating a company's performance. Recommended for serious investors. --Harry C. Edwards |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
Product Reviews |
 |
| Review this item. Coming soon! |
| Average rating: 4.3 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| Mistakes Undermine The Book's Vredibility |
|
Rating |
 |
| December 20, 2001 |
|
 |
 |
As a fund manager, I find that this book is beneficial to people working in the investment community or even to individual investors. It provides simple understanding to 33 financial ratios that are commonly used in the industry such as PBV, PER, ROCE, EV/EBITDA, etc. Nevertheless, silly mistakes in the examples given in the book undermine its credibility as a whole. For examples, in Figure 1.1 (pg 6), the share price is supposed to be $2.5 (and not $125 million) and in Figure 1.2, the author confuses the readers with the number of shares (532,798,000 or 532,748,0000?). To a novice, these errors may cause futher confusion as it would be difficult for him to understand the concepts. The author and editor of the book should have done a better job, especially considering that the subject involves is "investment". |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|